Prediction of Gail Brodsky vs Veronica Cepede Royg Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Brodsky vs V. Cepede Royg
Gail Brodsky
USA
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
34
Age
33
-
Height
1.63m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
182
Best Rank
73
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$33.6K
Career Money
$490.9K
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Veronica Cepede Royg
PAR
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
34
Age
33
-
Height
1.63m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
182
Best Rank
73
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$33.6K
Career Money
$490.9K
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Brodsky 0 - 0 Royg
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brodsky | 0 |
| Royg | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
G. Brodsky vs V. C. Royg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $33,595 | Career Prize Money | $490,909 |
| 57.03% (146-110) | Career Total W/L | 60.70% (431-279) |
| 6 | Titles | 14 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Brodsky vs V. C. Royg Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gail Brodsky has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Veronica Cepede Royg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gail Brodsky, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Veronica Cepede Royg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gail Brodsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Veronica Cepede Royg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gail Brodsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Veronica Cepede Royg winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gail Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/4). Veronica Cepede Royg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 282/137), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Gail Brodsky has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Veronica Cepede Royg has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gail Brodsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Veronica Cepede Royg has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gail Brodsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Veronica Cepede Royg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gail Brodsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Veronica Cepede Royg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gail Brodsky vs Veronica Cepede Royg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Brodsky 0%, Royg 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Brodsky 0%, Royg 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Brodsky 0%, Royg 0%.
G. Brodsky Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 W60 Lexington - 29-07-2019 | ||||
R1  Junri NamigataJ. Namigata | L | 7-5 ret. | ||
| W60 Ashland - 22-07-2019 | ||||
R2  Katie SwanK. Swan | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1  En Shuo LiangE. Shuo | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| W60 Berkeley - 15-07-2019 | ||||
QF Madison BrengleM. Brengle | L | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R2 Hiroko KuwataH. Kuwata | W | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | ||
V. C. Royg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Wimbledon - London - 27-06-2022 | ||||
Q1  Su Jeong JangS. Jeong | L | 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
 French Open - Paris - 23-05-2022 | ||||
Q2  Nastasja Mariana SchunkN. Mariana | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1  Anastasia TikhonovaA. Tikhonova | W | 7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | ||
| Australian Open - Melbourne - 17-01-2022 | ||||
Q1  Daria SnigurD. Snigur | L | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
| W60+H Bendigo - 03-01-2022 | ||||
R1  Fernanda Contreras GomezF. Contreras | L | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
G. Brodsky vs V. C. Royg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.03% (146/110) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.54% (428/279) |
| 53.96% (320/273) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.94% (949/689) |
| 51.36% (2784/2637) | Games Win/Loss | 53.61% (8035/6954) |
| 53.47% (77/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.47% (117/106) |
| 60.56% (43/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.30% (282/137) |
| 66.67% (22/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 47.73% (21/23) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 188 | Aces Total | 366 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 368 | Total Double Faults | 1036 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 580.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 556.81 |
| 55% (3244/5917) | 1st Serve % | 65% (16200/25047) |
| 62% (2017/3244) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9722/16200) |
| 44% (1175/2673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4206/8847) |
| 44% (333/759) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1414/2995) |
| 45% (2658/5922) | Return Points Win % | 45% (10985/24215) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (24/36) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (33/11) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 49.50% (50/51) |
| 56.82% (100/76) | Challenger W/L | 62.20% (232/141) |
| 77.78% (35/10) | Futures W/L | 73.87% (82/29) |
| 56% (137/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (423/702) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (27/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (88/156) |
| 59% (52/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (129/228) |
| 84% (141/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (413/362) |
| 15% (141/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (413/51) |
| 21% (114/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (294/65) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
I. Buse7
G. HeidePRW1
1.52
W2
2.33
07:30 PM 14/11/25
PredictionM. FarzamWCC. LiW1
2.875
W2
1.36
02:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
D. Glinka4
D. MartinW1
1.186
W2
4.1
06:15 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW. Leite6B. Kuzuhara2W1
3.78
W2
1.222
05:05 PM 14/11/25
Prediction
F. TentiPRJ. Estevez3W1
3.62
W2
1.24
09:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionL. Draxl1
M. KasnikowskiW1
1.52
W2
2.33
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
Top Predictions Today
Jannik Sinner
Alex De Minaur16:05
H2H 12-0
Alexander ZverevFelix Auger Aliassime22:30
H2H 6-3
Arantxa Rus
Tamara ZidansekH2H 2-1
Eva Lys
Zeynep SonmezH2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal